All Issue

2018 Vol.22, Issue 3 Preview Page

Review Article

Possibility and Limitation of Applying Occlusal Adjustment on Implant Prosthesis similar to Natural Teeth

임플란트 고정성 보철물에서 자연치와 비슷한 교합형성법에 대한 가능성과 한계

Bo-Seul Jeon
,
Seung-Kyun Kim
,
Jung-Jin Lee
,
Jae-Min Seo*
전 보슬
,
김 승균
,
이 정진
,
서 재민*
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University
전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소
*Corresponding Author
30 September 2018. pp. 162-172
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Restoration with fixed prostheses using implants is a generalized treatment method in partially or fully edentulous patients. In the past, where only the function of the implant prostheses was emphasized, successful osseointegration was just enough to be considered clinically satisfactory. Recently, however, as the patient’s demands have increased, the recovery of function and esthetics similar to the lost natural teeth has become an important issue for implant prostheses restoration. There may be controversy as to whether occlusion of natural teeth can be applied to implants with different morphological, histological, and dynamical characteristics from those of natural teeth. Therefore, this article will investigate the possibility, prerequisites, limitations and solutions of implant occlusion formation similar to natural teeth.

Keywords
Implant
Implant protected occlusion
Mutually protected occlusion
Prosthesis
References
1
Yuan JC, Sukotjo C. Occlusion for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients: a literature review and current concepts. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2013; 43: 51-57.
10.5051/jpis.2013.43.2.5123678387PMC3651937
2
Koyano K, Esaki D. Occlusion on oral implants: current clinical guidelines. J Oral Rehabil. 2015; 42: 153-161.
10.1111/joor.1223925284468
3
Lewis MB, Klineberg I. Prosthodontic considerations designed to optimize outcomes for single-tooth implants. A review of the literature. Aust Dent J. 2011; 56: 181-192.
10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01322.x21623811
4
Klineberg I, Kingston D, Murray G. The bases for using a particular occlusal design in tooth and implant-borne reconstructions and complete dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18: 151-167.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01446.x17594379
5
Weinberg LA. Reduction of implant loading with therapeutic biomechanics. Implant Dent. 1998; 7: 277-285.
10.1097/00008505-199807040-0000510196804
6
Morneburg TR, Pröschel PA. In vivo forces on implants influenced by occlusal scheme and food consistency. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16: 481-486.
14651231
7
Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, et al. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16: 26-35.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01067.x15642028
8
Eposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, et al. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants.(II) Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998; 106: 721-764.
10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-6-.x
9
Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, et al. Bending overload and implant failure: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10: 326-334.
7615329
10
Rangert B, Sullivan RM, Jemt TM. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12: 360-370.
9197101
11
Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Branemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994; 9: 345-360.
12
Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral mplants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996; 7: 143-152.
10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070208.x9002833
13
Isidor F. Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal load or plaque accumulation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997; 8: 1-9.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00001.x9586450
14
Hurzeler, MB, Quinones CR, Kohal RJ, et al. Changes in peri-implant tissues subjected to orthodontic forces and ligature breakdown in monkeys. J Periodontol. 1998; 69: 396-404.
10.1902/jop.1998.69.3.3969579628
15
Miyata T, Kobayashi Y, Araki H, et al. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue: A histologic study in monkeys. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13: 677-683.
9796152
16
The korean academy of stomatognathic function and occlusion. Textbook of human jaw function and occlusion. Seoul: Yenang Inc.; 2014 p. 363-7, 387.
17
Lang NP, Wilson TG, Corbet EF. Biological complications with dental implants: their prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000; 11: 146-155.
10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1146.x11168263
18
Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Schmid B, Weigel C, et al. Does excessive occlusal load affect osseointegration? An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15: 259-268.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01019.x15142087
19
Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants subjected to static load of different duration. A study in the dog (III). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12: 552-8.
10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120602.x11737098
20
Lee KB. Consideration of occlusion for implant-supported fixed prostheses. J Kor Dent Assoc. 2013; 51: 242-249.
21
Park YB. Clinical consideration for appropriate occlusion of implant restorations. J Kor Dent Assoc. 2015; 53: 418-426.
22
Rilo B, da Silva JL, Mora MJ, et al. Guidelines for occlusion strategy in implant-borne prostheses. A review. Int Dent J. 2008; 58: 139-145.
10.1111/j.1875-595X.2008.tb00189.x18630109
23
Stanford CM. Issues and considerations in dental implant occlusion: what do we know, and what do we need to find out? J Calif Dent Assoc. 2005; 33: 329-336.
15915884
24
Yun CH, Kim DG, Lee YZ, et al. Clinical evaluation of occlusal contact changes in implant prosthesis. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 2007; 23: 21-30.
25
Cho WR, Huh YH, Park CJ, et al. Effect of cyclic loading and retightening on reverse torque value in external and internal implants. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015; 7: 288-293.
10.4047/jap.2015.7.4.28826330975PMC4551784
26
Lee JH, Kweon HH, Choi SH, et al. Association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars: a long-term follow-up clinical and radiographic analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016; 46: 396-404.
10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.39628050317PMC5200865
27
Liu S, Liu Y, Xu J, et al. Influence of occlusal contact and cusp inclination on the biomechanical character of a maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1238-1245.
10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.01124836532
28
Torbjörner A, Fransson B. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 135-141.
29
Misch CE. Occlusal considerations for implant supported prostheses. In: Comtemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. p. 609-628.
30
Kaukinen JA, Edge MJ, Lang BR. The influence of occlusal design on simulated masticatory forces transferred to implant-retained prostheses and supporting bone. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76: 50-55.
10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90346-7
31
Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier; 2013. p. 443-468.
32
Sadid-Zadeh R, Kutkut A, Kim H. Prosthetic failure in implant dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2015; 59: 195-214.
10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.00825434566
33
Carlsson GE. Dental occlusion: mordern concepts and their application in implant prosthodontics. Odontology. 2009; 97: 8-17.
10.1007/s10266-008-0096-x19184293
34
Kim MK, Lee JH, Seo JM, et al. Regeneration of emergence profile with soft tissue graft and widecomputer aided design/computer aided mamufacturing abutments: a clinical report. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 2015; 31: 364-370.
10.14368/jdras.2015.31.4.364
35
Brito C, Tenebaum HC, Wong BK, et al. Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri-implant health? A systematic review of the literature. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014; 102: 643-650.
10.1002/jbm.b.3304224124021
36
Alshiddi IF, Dent DC. Accurate registration of peri-implant soft tissue to create an optimal emergence profile, Contemp Clin Dent. 2015; 6: 122-125.
10.4103/0976-237X.15296725821365PMC4374309
37
Van steenberghe D, Haert I, Jacobs F, et al. Influence of inflammatory reactions vs. occlusal loading on peri-implant marginal bone level. Adv Dent Res. 1999; 13: 130-135.
10.1177/0895937499013001020111276735
38
Roccuzzo M, Grasso G, Dalmasso P. Keratinized mucosa around implants in partially edentulous posterior mandibule: 10-year results of a prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 491-496.
10.1111/clr.1256325706508
39
Lin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2013; 84: 1755-1767.
10.1902/jop.2013.12068823451989
40
Wang Y, Zhang Y, Miron RJ. Health, maintenance, and recovery of soft tissue around implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016; 18: 618-634.
10.1111/cid.1234325873299
41
Dawson PE. Functional Occlusion From TMJ to Smile Design. St. Louis: Mosby; 2007. p. 160-73, 346-348.
17419472
42
Chapman RJ. Principles of occlusion for implant prostheses: guidelines for position, timing, and force of occlusal contacts. Quintessence Int. 1989; 20: 473-480.
2697023
43
Engelman MJ. Clinical decision making and treatment planning in osseointegration. In: Occlusion. 1st ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 1996. p. 169-176.
44
Wismeijer D, van Wass MA, Kalk W. Factors to consider in selecting an occlusal concept for patients with implants in the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 1995; 74: 380-384.
10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80378-6
45
Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992; 3: 104-111.
10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x1290790
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  • Journal Title :Implantology
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
  • Volume : 22
  • No :3
  • Pages :162-172
  • Received Date : 2018-07-11
  • Revised Date : 2018-09-19
  • Accepted Date : 2018-09-20
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180014
Journal Informaiton Journal of implantology and applied sciences Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Online Submission & Review System
  • NRF
  • 임플란트학회 전용 배너
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close