All Issue

2019 Vol.23, Issue 2 Preview Page

June 2019. pp. 86-94
Abstract


References
1 

Kapos T, Ashy LM, Gallucci GO, et al. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24(suppl): 110-117.

2 

Kapos T, Evans C. CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29(suppl): 117-136.

10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g2.324660194
3 

Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res. 2016; 60: 72-84.

10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.00326935333
4 

Fluegge T, Att W, Metzger M, et al. A novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodies-an experimental approach. J Prosthodont. 2017; 26: 34-41.

10.1111/jopr.1236226466158
5 

Joda T, Ferrari M, Gallucci GO, et al. Digital technology in fixed implant prosthodontics. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73: 178-192.

10.1111/prd.1216428000274
6 

Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Kerdijk W, et al. Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for singleunit premolar implant crowns: operating time and patient preference. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114: 403-406.

10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.00326047800
7 

Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH, et al. Intraoral scanning systems - a current overview. Int J Comput Dent. 2015; 18: 101-129.

8 

Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, et al. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 184-190.

10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.01726946916
9 

Henry PJ, Harnist DJ. Dimensional stability and accuracy of rubber impression materials. Aust Dent J. 1974; 19: 162-166.

10.1111/j.1834-7819.1974.tb05033.x
10 

Lacy AM, Fukui H, Bellman T, et al. Time-dependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials. Part II: Polyether, polysulfides, and polyvinylsiloxane. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 45: 329-333.

10.1016/0022-3913(81)90400-5
11 

Joda T, Brägger U. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: A cost/time analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 1430-1435.

10.1111/clr.1247625179680
12 

Jeon JH, Choi BY, Kim CM, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114: 549-553.

10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.01926182854
13 

Jeon JH, Jung ID, Kim JH, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scans of stone models and impressions using a blue LED scanner. Dent Mater J. 2015; 34: 686-691.

10.4012/dmj.2014-34726438993
14 

Jeon JH, Kim DY, Lee JJ, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of individual abutment impression, assessed with a blue light scanner. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016; 8: 214-218.

10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.21427350856PMC4919492
15 

Matta RE, Adler W, Wichmann M, et al. Accuracy of impression scanning compared with stone casts of implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 507-512.

10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.02627881327
16 

Mandelli F, Ferrini F, Gastaldi G, et al. Improvement of a digital impression with conventional materials: overcoming intraoral scanner limitations. Int J Prosthodont. 2017; 30: 373-376.

10.11607/ijp.513828697209
17 

Lee B, Oh KC, Haam D, et al. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital impression procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120: 225-231.

10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.00329428522
18 

Wilson EG, Werrin SR. Double arch impressions for simplified restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 49: 198-202.

10.1016/0022-3913(83)90500-0
19 

Donovan TE, Chee WW. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48: 445-470.

10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.01415172610
20 

Johnson GH, Mancl LA, Schwedhelm ER, et al. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 103: 13-22.

10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60208-0
21 

Lee JH. A completely cast-free, digital workflow for fabricating an implant-supported prosthesis with a new coded healing abutment. Implantol. 2019; 23: 32-41.

10.32542/implantology.2019003
22 

Parpaiola A, Norton MR, Cecchinato D, et al. Virtual abutment design: A concept for delivery of CAD/CAM customized abutments - report of a retrospective cohort. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33: 51-58.

10.11607/prd.127223342347
23 

Goldstein G, Vafiadis D, Kim J. Finding Z: A mathematical method for predicting tissue position after implant abutment-restoration placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 322-324.

10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.02724793352
24 

Mehl A. A new concept for the integration of dynamic occlusion in the digital construction process. Int J Comput Dent. 2012; 15: 109-123.

25 

Moráguez OD, Belser UC. The use of polytetrafluoroethylene tape for the management of screw access channels in implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 103: 189-191.

10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60029-7
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  • Journal Title :IMPLANTOLOGY
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
  • Volume : 23
  • No :2
  • Pages :86-94
  • Received Date :2018. 11. 02
  • Revised Date :2019. 06. 05
  • Accepted Date : 2019. 06. 12